Friday, 19 June 2015

My First Visit to Barabanki (and other stories)

It sounded simple enough. We were going shoot a short documentary with Khabar Lahariya on debt, and its emotional and social impact on farmers. 

Simple, because we assumed our pivot was a clear story of a perpetrator, the system, and a victim, the farmer. It really did sound that simple, because you know, as self-respecting left liberals who had read every newspaper report from here to the American drought, we knew we were going to just throw a giant electric beam through this whole debt-suicide nexus.

48 hours with Khabar Lahariya journalist, Lakshmi, on one beat, to investigate one case, which has been registered as a farmer suicide, only taught us one thing.

That we know nothing.


'A farmer went outside the DM’s office in Barabanki and hung himself. KL is investigating. You know Lakshmi?' Alam, our driver, mumbles a sure, but what’s the film about? 'Umm, you know this whole culture of debt, the breakdown of agrarian economy…' 'I don’t know what you are talking about,' he interrupts. 'I’ve just come back from my village, my uncle’s farm. All the wheat is fine. So, what else do you know?'
Lakshmi sits cross-legged, and swaps between five Whatsapp windows while taking us through the case. 'The question is, how did he get three bank loans against the same piece of land?'She tries the number of the inspector in-charge for the umpteenth time. 'We need to see the FIR.' She has just travelled an hour to meet us, changed three buses, and now sits calculating how much interest it takes for a Dalit farmer in UP to run up credit of 15 lakhs.
The tree from which Asharam was found hanging is probably a young peepal, which sits halfway between the Barabanki district court on the left, and the Barabanki police station on the right. We go right. The Investigating Officer is in court, but a team of opinionated men surround Lakshmi and me with chairs. 'Let’s discuss the connection between debt and suicides in farmers?' asks Lakshmi. 'Well, statistically speaking, there are as many suicides in other professions. Lots of people kill themselves, why are you only looking at farmers?' said one man, not in uniform, but with the authority of one. 'What does the post-mortem say?' replies Lakshmi.

'I’m going to give you information only because you’ve come all this way in the sun,' says the investigating officer magnanimously, when he arrives. 'When I take a loan I can’t even sleep at night. I know I have to return it. But these people, they take a loan to repay a previous loan. Why? It’s like they don’t understand money. And the government keeps announcing subsidies around every election. Yeh loan maaf.Voh loan maaf. So, they feel they don’t have to return it.'

Lakshmi asks for the FIR one more time. The investigating officer doesn’t hand it to her, but reads it out loudwhilethe whole station stands rapt. The FIR is against a Suresh Chand for lending money to Asharam against the land of the deceased’s best friend Vijay, without any written paperwork, and then putting pressure on the deceased such that he was driven to kill himself.

'Why did Vijay mortgage his land for someone else?' asks Lakshmi, to no one in particular, on our way to Bhul Bhuliya, the village of the deceased.
Asharam’s ample house glistens with its fresh coat of pink. His wife, two sons, and brother-in-law, answer Lakshmi in automation. I don’t know how much the debt is, they say. I don’t know how much he owed the bank, she says. The government hasn’t helped me, except for the seven lakh rupee cheque she says. I want free education for my sons. 'Who did you file the FIR against?' asks Lakshmi. 'We haven’t filed any FIR,' says the brother-in-law. 'But the FIR has your name on it,' says Lakshmi. 'I never filed it,' says the brother-in-law.

Suresh walks out of his thatched home, dressed in little more thana thread across his chest. 'I knew someone would come,' he says and waits for us to start recording. 'I know I have an FIR against me because Amar Ujala reported it. But I have not been served any notice,' he says with practised calm. 'You lent money to Asharam?' asks Lakshmi. 'Does it look like I have money to lend?' We get batashas. And tea. 'I’ve legally bought Vijay’s land, and I’ve been giving him money. Now what he does with that is his problem.' Lakshmi asks what he means by legally. He doesn’t stir, but two copies of stamp paper magically appear, each bearing a photograph of Suresh Chand and Vijay Yadav. Lakshmi reads silently. More women and children appear from the same house, waiting for something. 'Okay, I need a record of this,' says Lakshmi, and takes photographs of the documents on her phone.

'The question you need to ask is, what is the relationship between Vijay and Asharam? Unke gehre sambandh ke baare mein hum nahin bata sakte. It’s too dirty,' says Suresh Chand, not moving a muscle.

We sit on a charpai outside Vijay’s house because he has gone to cremate someone. On his return, he mics himself up with the deftness of a final year film school student. 'You see, a harijan can’t sell his land – so I offered to mortgage mine because Asharam was very dear to me.' So, you must know about his debt. 'No, I didn’t know that, else I would’ve dissuaded him from taking this step,' says Vijay, practising for court. 'I don’t understand,' says Lakshmi. 'How can you be his best friend and not know how much debt he has?'

Lakshmi does not speak for the ride home. Trucks’ headlights fall on her and fade, but she does not speak. What is the story, then, I ask her. 'I don’t know yet. But I still want to see the bank papers. How did three banks give him a loan and against what…'

Yes, okay but are we following her investigating a farmer’s suicide then? 'I guess not,' she said. 'I also need to check how there are no eye witnesses to the hanging.'

**
Click here to watch a video that attempts to tell this murky tale.

Shabani Hassanwalia is the co-founder of Hit and Run Films, an independent film company, which engages with changing socio-political-personal realities through non-fiction cinema.


Monday, 15 June 2015

शादी पर रिपोर्टिंग के साइड इफेक्ट्स

2003 की बात है। खबर लहरिया की शुरूवात ही हुई थी। अखबार का पहला साल पूरा होने वाला था कि अचानक एक खबर को लेकर बवाल मच गया। रेहुटियां गांव में दहेज मांगने को लेकर लड़के वालों को लड़की पक्ष ने तीन दिन तक गांव के प्राइमरी स्कूल में बंद कर रखा था। इस खबर को खबर लहरिया की पत्रकार सोनिया मानिकपुर से लाई थी।   

खबर को पढ़ कर लड़के वालों को बहुत बुरा लगा। उनका मानना था कि उनकी इज़्ज़त का सवाल था। उन लोगों ने खबर लहरिया में लिखित डाक द्वारा कानूनी नोटिस भेजा कि वह खबर लहरिया पर मुकदमा ठोक देंगे। साथ ही खबर लाने वाले पत्रकार को भी 'देख लेंगे'। उस नोटिस को देख थोड़ी देर के लिए मैं भी घबरा गई। सोनिया भी घबराई हुई थी क्योंकि वो मानिकपुर में ही रहती थी। अगर कोर्ट केस हो जाता तो हमारे पास अपनी सच्चाई साबित करने के लिए कुछ नहीं था। दिल्ली टीम से सुझाव लेकर मैं और सोनिया रेहुटियां गांव लड़की वालों के घर गए।

2012 में रिपोर्टिंग करती मीरा  (फोटो: दिशा मलिक)
गांव में घुसते ही लोग हमें ऐसे देख रहे थे जैसे हमने किसी की हत्या की हो। हम सुबह से दोपहर तक गांव में अलग-अलग लोगों से मिले पर कोई अपना नाम देने को तैयार नहीं था। अंत में हम लोगों को समझा पाए। लड़की वाले भी बाद में मान गए। दरअसल, लड़के वालों ने पहले तो दहेज के लिए मना किया था पर ऐन मौके पर लड़का टी.वी. मांगने लगा। लड़की इस बात को सुन कर गुस्सा हो गई और उसने शादी के लिए मना कर दिया था। इस बात को लेकर मारपीट भी हुई थी। तभी गांव वालों ने लड़के वालों को पकड़ कर तीन दिन तक स्कूल में बंद रखा था। 

इस खबर को कवर करते समय मैंने एक ऐसी बात सीखी जो आज तक मेरे साथ है - हमें बिना ठोस प्रूफ के कोई खबर को नहीं छापनी चाहिए। शायद उस दिन मेरी जगह रेहुटियां कोई और जाता तो लोगों का गुस्सा और भड़क जाता? मुझे पहली बार एक पत्रकार होने का एहसास हुआ और पत्रकार होने के नाते अपनी ज़िम्मेदारियाँ एक नई रौशनी में समझ आईं।

**

मीरा जाटव खबर लहरिया अखबार से 2002 से जुड़ी हुई हैं। मीरा ने रिपोर्टिंग से शुरुआत की और आज विमेन मीडिया एंड न्यूज़ ट्रस्ट की चीफ ऑपरेशन्ज़ ऑफिसर हैं। चित्रकूट की रहने वाली मीरा खबर लहरिया के मैनेजमेंट का ज़रूरी हिस्सा हैं। 

Thursday, 4 June 2015

Snakebirth in the Newsroom! Khabar Lahariya Then and Now

Thursday afternoon last week - May 2015. The file had gone to press. Production was over in a day and half. It felt strange. Kavita and Meera were discussing other issues - hiring new reporters, stringers, assigining duties to the marketing team....Flash back to May 2002.

As a feminist editorial team, we believed that process was as important as the product itself. There were six people in the Khabar Lahariya team - all six with different skill sets and varied levels of literacy. All six were present for the editorial meeting on the first day of production. Each person shared the stories she had gathered that week; each person was meant to give feedback on each story that was shared.

‘How can we have two stories from Manikpur block on the same page?' a young Kavita dared to raise this question in one editorial meeting. Sonia and Shanti, the two middle-aged reporters from Manikpur jumped down her throat – ‘We have been bringing stories from Manikpur even before you came into this world.' Before a rattled Kavita could reply, Meera’s wise reminder about not having two similar stories on the same page calmed people down.
A scene from the Banda office in 2005 (Photo Credit: Ami Vitale)

We spent the entire day arguing, eating our elaborate Bundelkhand meals and then at night, the same newsroom turned into a common bedroom! Everyone was happy to share the same space, the same plate and at times, the same quilt - including Kavita and Sonia! There were times when I felt like it was more than I could take in a day or maybe a lifetime, but there was no getting away. Process was sacred and how I felt really did not matter!

Day 2 
Back in the edit room, armed with drafts. Each person read her story, got feedback from everyone else, and then – some stoic, some stormy - began to rewrite. We respected diversity, but sometimes skill sets and life experiences would start competing, ‘You are padhi-likhi, college pass. Don’t you know that this scheme is only for families that are below the poverty line’?
Shanti’s story about a woman giving birth to a snake was questioned and dropped. She refused to eat. ‘How will I return to the village and explain how you all dropped this story that the entire village was witness to? This is the problem with young, kasba type people; you don’t understand what people in villages go through.' Several hours and conversations later I dragged Shanti to the doctor’s clinic in town. The quack turned doctor was in a tight spot. Here was an urban, educated person questioning his knowledge of science and medicine, but with her was a rural, potential client who he was likely to encounter again. He asked Shanti for a few insignificant details - which village was this, what time was ‘it’ born, who all were present there. Finally, after flipping through a few pages of some book he said, ‘I think it could have been a tapeworm.' Shanti looked aghast. I felt victorious. We returned and resumed the process, after Shanti had had her meal!
Day 3
The stories finally took some shape on day three. The illustrations were as rigorously debated as the stories. All six reporters – literate or semi literate - sat in the same room, leaning over computer operator and editors, ensuring not a word was edited without their approval. Power failures, technical problems, angry husbands at the gate: ‘Humein to kaam hi nahin karvaana hai... We don’t want our women to work, we know what’s going on here; which office requires its staff to stay four nights?’ This went on forever.

For the longest time I didn’t book a train ticket back to Delhi, not knowing when production would finally be over. It could be four days or five. Finally when Krishna boarded the bus to the press in Allahabad with the print outs and the floppy disk, I would go to the station, book my ticket and swear to myself that this ‘process’ had to change!

Thirteen years later, we’re as feminist as ever, but we are more efficient, our roles more defined and our offices more equipped with technology and power backups. Meera and Kavita have passed on the baton of editing drafts and I am certainly not present in Karwi during production. In body atleast.

**

Shalini Joshi is one of the founder members of Khabar Lahariya and has worked on issues of gender and justice for over 15 years.